Within

2012
06.14

I’ll start by saying this certainly is no big deal.  No jobs will be lost, heads will not roll, the sun WILL come up tomorrow (unless perhaps, you’re reading this on December 20th), but:

When two teams are playing a game against each other, and one team scores, I really wish commentators (and when did ‘commentators’ become a word – so they ‘commentate’, do they?) would stop saying the team that’s behind is ‘within‘ whatever the score differential is – to wit:

“…The Mudhens started the inning with a commanding lead of 6-1.  Now with the grand slam, the Bulls have made a game of it by pulling to within 1!…”

Is it really ‘within’ one?

NO!

It’s just 1.

At least in baseball, scores are recorded as integers, so there’s never any fractional ‘phantom ground’ that would justify describing the difference between the leading and losing teams’ scores as ‘within’ any number, whole or otherwise.  EVER!

OK – it’s an idiom.  It’s also idiotic.

Your Reply